<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Netconcepts</title>
	<link>http://www.netconcepts.com</link>
	<description>Specialists in SEO, web dev, online marketing, and ecommerce</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.3" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>megan@netconcepts.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>megan@netconcepts.com</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Specialists in SEO, web dev, online marketing, and ecommerce</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Technology"/>
<itunes:category text="Business">
  <itunes:category text="Management &amp; Marketing"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>megan@netconcepts.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.netconcepts.com/images/NetconceptsPodcast.gif" />
		
		<item>
		<title>New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click</title>
		<link>http://www.netconcepts.com/new-eyetracking-study-where-google-searchers-look-and-click/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netconcepts.com/new-eyetracking-study-where-google-searchers-look-and-click/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Spencer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Media]]></category>
<category>Blogs</category><category>Usability</category><category>Web Development</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephanspencer.com/archives/2005/03/10/new-eyetracking-study-where-google-searchers-look-and-click/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the eyetracking study from Enquiro and Did-It unveiled last week at Search Engine Strategies and covered in Search Day fascinating. The aggregate heat map shown on the right (larger version here) shows where participants focused their eyes (and their attention) the most. As you can see, the first listing not only drew the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/images/map.jpg"><img src="http://www.stephanspencer.com/images/smallmap.jpg" alt="aggregate map" align="right" width="200" height="301" /></a>I found the <a href="http://www.enquiro.com/eye-tracking-pr.asp">eyetracking study from Enquiro and Did-It</a> unveiled last week at Search Engine Strategies and <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3488076">covered in Search Day</a> fascinating. The aggregate heat map shown on the right (larger version <a href="/images/map.jpg">here</a>) shows where participants focused their eyes (and their attention) the most. As you can see, the first listing not only drew the most attention; the full listing was read more fully from left to right, than other listings.</p>
<p>Visibility drops the further down the search results you go, and clickthroughs drop even more markedly (as you can see from the graphs below). This got me thinking about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf's_law">Zipf&#8217;s Law</a>. Zipf&#8217;s Law is applicable to Top Ten Lists, as <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/37/ideavirus.html">Seth Godin explains</a>, perhaps Zipf&#8217;s Law might be applicable to the SERPs (<u>s</u>earch <u>e</u>ngine <u>r</u>esults <u>p</u>ages) too? (In general terms, Zipf&#8217;s Law states that being #1 is much, much better than being #2 which is much, much better than being #3 and so on. So dominating a Top 10 list is critical.) Although these graphs don&#8217;t follow Zipf&#8217;s Law exactly, nonetheless given this data I&#8217;d consider it foolish to be complacent if your search listings are not at the very top of the SERPs.</p>
<p>What is it about searchers that makes them so blind to relevant results further down the page? Is this due to the &#8220;implied endorsement&#8221; effect, where searchers tend to simply trust Google to point them to the right thing? Or is it just the way humans are wired, to make snap decisions, <a href="http://www.chrislott.org/article/984/blink-malcolm-gladwell">as Malcolm Gladwell insightfully explains in his new book, Blink</a>? According to the study, 72% of searchers click on the first link of interest, whereas 25.5% read all listings first, then decide. My guess is that both effects (&#8221;implied endorsement&#8221; and &#8220;rapid cognition&#8221;) play a role in searcher behavior.</p>
<p>A few other important take-aways from the study:</p>
<ol>
<li>6/7 (85%) of searchers click on natural (&#8221;organic&#8221;) results (not 60/40 as the search engines and PPC (pay-per-click) vendors would have you believe).</li>
<li>The top 4 sponsored slots are equivalent in views to being ranked at #7 - #10 natural.</li>
<li>(corollary to #2): This means if you need to make a business case for natural search, then (assuming you can attain at least #3 rank in natural for the same keywords you bid on) natural search could be worth two to three times your PPC results.</li>
</ol>
<p>
In all, a superb research study. Great job Did-It, Enquiro, and EyeTools!</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.stephanspencer.com/images/visibility.gif" alt="line graph of visibility" /><br />
<img src="http://www.stephanspencer.com/images/clickthroughs.gif" alt="line graph of clickthroughs" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netconcepts.com/new-eyetracking-study-where-google-searchers-look-and-click/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Web Site Should Not Need a Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.netconcepts.com/your-web-site-should-not-need-a-manual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netconcepts.com/your-web-site-should-not-need-a-manual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Spencer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News &amp; Media]]></category>
<category>Articles</category><category>Usability</category><category>Web Development</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netconcepts.com/your-web-site-should-not-need-a-manual/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usability. Boring but crucial, it's about making your website easy and intuitive to use. Users shouldn't need to learn how to use your site. Put stuff where people expect it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Usability. Boring but crucial, it&#8217;s about making your website easy and intuitive to use.</p>
<p>Users shouldn&#8217;t need to learn how to use your site. Put stuff where people expect it. Don&#8217;t put the navigation bar on the right or the bottom (<a href="http://www.fullyequipped.co.nz">www.fullyequipped.co.nz</a>); or make non-clickable content indiscernible from clickable content (see <a href="http://www.sinalei.com"</a>www.sinalei.com</a>). Don&#8217;t force users to hover their mouse over a button to see what it does (like the old bottle cap navigation on <a href="http://www.coke.co.nz">www.coke.co.nz</a>). And never obscure the user&#8217;s browser toolbar (the bit that contains the back, forward and refresh buttons) like <a href="http://www.max.co.nz">www.max.co.nz</a>.</p>
<p>Designers like to show off and be different, but different isn&#8217;t always better on the web so be prepared to reel in your designer.</p>
<p>Here are some tips:</p>
<ul>
<li>Have a search function on your site. Many people prefer searching by keyword rather than browsing.
</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t have a &#8220;Flash&#8221; intro - a multimedia presentation that&#8217;s played upon entering your site. Your website is not a television commercial. If you had to sit through an ad every time you phoned a supplier, you&#8217;d soon be taking your business elsewhere.
</li>
<li>Keep the navigation consistent across your site.
</li>
<li>Include navigation on every page of your site. Visitors may find your site through a search engine so will not necessarily enter through your home page.
</li>
<li>Place a &#8220;Contact us&#8221; link on every page. Don&#8217;t just link to your email address, provide a fill-in form, telephone number and postal and street address.
</li>
<li>Use &#8220;breadcrumb navigation&#8221; to show the viewed page&#8217;s category and subcategory. Make each of those category levels a clickable link. Essentially you&#8217;re leaving a trail for users to follow so they can jump back a category or two without continually using the &#8220;Back&#8221; button. For example, at the top of its billing requests page, <a href="http://www.telecom.co.nz">www.telecom.co.nz</a> displays: Home page > Personal > How can we help? > Help with your bill > Billing requests.
</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t use &#8220;frames&#8221;, where parts of the web page scroll but others stay fixed. Frames make it difficult, if not impossible, for users to bookmark your pages. Try bookmarking the membership page on www.aa.co.nz, for instance. Search engines don&#8217;t like frames, either.
</li>
<li>Name things intuitively. <a href="http://www.coke.co.nz">www.coke.co.nz</a> has a section called &#8220;Spill It&#8221; - not helpful.
</li>
<li>Minimise the number of clicks required to perform important functions on your site, such as placing an order or making an enquiry. Amazon&#8217;s &#8220;1-Click Ordering&#8221; is the epitome of efficiency.
</li>
</ul>
<p>Want more? Read <em>Don&#8217;t Make Me Think</em> by Steve Krug, and <em>Designing Web Usability and Homepage Usability</em> by Jakob Nielsen. </p>
<p><em>By Stephan Spencer. This article first appeared on <a href="http://www.unlimited.co.nz/unlimited.nsf/UNID/45C6686889BDB74ACC256CB1001A27F2?OpenDocument">Unlimited</a> in February 2003.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netconcepts.com/your-web-site-should-not-need-a-manual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
